← Back to home

Document 1:20-cv-00243-RBWSDocument 136-75

Full Text

Case 1:20-cv-00243-RBW Document 136-75 Filed 08/04/216 Page 12 of 33 connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL. 11. Challenging Designations Of Protected Material (a) A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation of dDiscovery mMaterial under this Order at the time the designation is made, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Moreover, failure to challenge the designation of any dDiscovery mMaterial as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY shall not in any way constitute an admission that such material contains any competitively sensitive information, trade secret information, or other protectable material. 12. (b) In the event that counsel for the Party receiving CONFIDENTIALProtected Material objects to the CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY designation of any or all such items, said counsel shall provide the Producing Party and, if different, the Designating Party written notice of, and the basis for, such objections. The Parties will use their best efforts to resolve such objections among themselves. Should the Receiving Party, the Producing Party and, if different, the Designating Party be unable to resolve the objections, the Receiving Party may seek a hearing before this Court with respect to the propriety of the designation. The DOJ-OGR-00002454