← Back to home

Document 2017-00330-AUN-DR

AI Analysis

Summary: The document discusses the government's evidence in a criminal case, highlighting that multiple witnesses and documentary evidence corroborate the victims' accounts of interacting with the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein. The government argues that this evidence strongly supports the victims' testimony. The defendant has filed a motion complaining about the volume of documentary evidence produced.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it outlines the government's evidence and corroborating witnesses that support the allegations against the defendant, making it a significant filing in the case.
Key Topics: Corroboration of victim testimony Documentary evidence supporting allegations Government's evidence against the defendant
Key People:
  • The defendant - Accused individual in the case
  • Jeffrey Epstein - Individual associated with the defendant and alleged crimes

Full Text

Case #: 2017-00330-AUN-DR Document #: 01002 Filed: 03/28/20 Page: 4 of 36 In addition to corroborating each other, these victims' accounts are further corroborated by other witnesses and by documentary evidence, which has been produced in discovery. That evidence will make it virtually indisputable that these victims in fact met and interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein at the times and locations they describe. Beyond this documentary evidence, additional witnesses will confirm that both the defendant and Epstein knew and interacted with certain minor victims when those victims were minors. In other words, the Government's evidence strongly corroborates the victims' testimony that they met and interacted with the defendant and Epstein at particular times and in particular places. In the instant motion, the defendant complains that the documentary evidence relevant to the three victims identified in the Indictment and produced to date is not sufficiently voluminous 2 In its Renewed Bail Motion, the defense complains