← Back to home

Document 225

AI Analysis

Summary: The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell informs the court that the defense agrees that the motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment is moot due to the return of the S2 superseding indictment by a grand jury in Manhattan. The letter is in response to the court's Opinion and Order dated April 16, 2021. The case is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
Significance: This document is significant because it shows the defense's agreement that a motion to dismiss the indictment is moot due to a superseding indictment being returned by a different grand jury.
Key Topics: Ghislaine Maxwell case motion to dismiss indictment grand jury proceedings
Key People:
  • Christian R. Everdell - Defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
  • Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
  • Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
Document Type
Letter
Date
04/21/21
Pages
1
Folder
IMAGES002

Full Text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 225 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 1 COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Everdell +1 (212) 957-7600 ceverdell@cohengresser.com 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone www.cohengresser.com April 21, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Pursuant to the Court's Opinion and Order, dated April 16, 2021 (Dkt. 207), we write to inform the Court that the defense agrees that Ms. Maxwell's motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment on the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse (Dkt. 125) is now moot in light of the fact that a grand jury sitting in Manhattan returned the S2 superseding indictment. Sincerely, /s/ Christian Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 957-7600 cc: All Counsel of Record (By ECF) DOJ-OGR-00003915