← Back to home

Document 226

AI Analysis

Summary: The court order directs the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to confer with the Government regarding redactions to certain documents, and sets deadlines for submitting redaction requests and justifications.
Significance: This document is significant as it reveals the court's handling of sensitive information and redactions in a high-profile case involving Ghislaine Maxwell.
Key Topics: Redactions to court documents Protective order in the case Rule 17(c) subpoena objections
Key People:
  • Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
  • Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
  • Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) - Law firm involved in the case

Full Text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 226 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's April 19, 2021 joint letter responding to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 215. The letter proposes limited redactions on the basis that some of the information is covered by the terms of the protective order in this case. In light of this, by April 22, 2021, the Defendant and BSF are hereby ORDERED to confer with the Government regarding whether the Government requests redaction of any information contained in the Defendant's response to BSF's objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, BSF's reply, and the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the redactions to these documents. The Government may submit any redaction requests by April 23, 2021; in doing so, the Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not, the Defendant shall file the letter on the public docket by April 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/21/21 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 226 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2 Dated: April 21, 2021 New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Individual Pages

Page 1 - DOJ-OGR-00003916
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 226 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's April 19, 2021 joint letter responding to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 215. The letter proposes limited redactions on the basis that some of the information is covered by the terms of the protective order in this case. In light of this, by April 22, 2021, the Defendant and BSF are hereby ORDERED to confer with the Government regarding whether the Government requests redaction of any information contained in the Defendant's response to BSF's objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, BSF's reply, and the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the redactions to these documents. The Government may submit any redaction requests by April 23, 2021; in doing so, the Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not, the Defendant shall file the letter on the public docket by April 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/21/21
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00003917
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 226 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2 Dated: April 21, 2021 New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge