← Back to home

Document 285-7

AI Analysis

Summary: This document is an exhibit filed in a court case, detailing a categorical log entry for approximately 57 documents withheld due to public interest privilege, related to an ongoing criminal investigation. The plaintiff objected to the defendant's discovery requests as overly broad and burdensome. The log entry covers email and letter communications regarding the law enforcement investigation.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it relates to a criminal investigation and highlights a dispute over the discovery of privileged information in a court case.
Key Topics: Law enforcement investigation Privilege logging Discovery objections
Key People:
  • Virginia Giuffre - Involved party in the law enforcement investigation
  • David Boies - Attorney involved in the matter
  • Stan Pottinger - Attorney involved in the matter
  • Sigrid McCawley - Attorney involved in the matter
  • Paul Cassell - Attorney involved in the matter
  • Brad Edwards - Attorney involved in the matter
Document Type
Exhibit
Date
05/20/21
Pages
2
Folder
IMAGES002

Full Text

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-7 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT P DOJ-OGR-00004200 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-7 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 2 Log ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To CC Address Subject Matter Type of Privilege Privilege Action Page Count Doc Type 153 Email and letter communications re law enforcement investigation The law enforcement entity, Virginia Giuffre, David Boies, Stan Pottinger, Sigrid McCawley, Paul Cassell, Brad Edwards The law enforcement entity, Virginia Giuffre, David Boies, Stan Pottinger, Sigrid McCawley, Paul Cassell, Brad Edwards Plaintiff has objected that Defendant's requests are overly broad and unduly burdensome, as individually logging all privileged responsive documents would be overly burdensome. Plaintiff contends that requests targeting such privileged information are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, are not important to resolving the issues, are not relevant to any party's claim or defense, are not proportional to the needs of the case, and creates a heavy burden on Plaintiff that outweighs its benefit. Therefore, Plaintiff has employed categorical logging pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.2(c). This categorical entry is regarding correspondence re the currently ongoing criminal investigation of Defendant and others. Public Interest Withheld approx. 57 documents DOJ-OGR-00004201

Individual Pages

Page 1 - DOJ-OGR-00004200
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-7 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT P DOJ-OGR-00004200
Page 2 of 2 - DOJ-OGR-00004201
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-7 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 2 Log ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To CC Address Subject Matter Type of Privilege Privilege Action Page Count Doc Type 153 Email and letter communications re law enforcement investigation The law enforcement entity, Virginia Giuffre, David Boies, Stan Pottinger, Sigrid McCawley, Paul Cassell, Brad Edwards The law enforcement entity, Virginia Giuffre, David Boies, Stan Pottinger, Sigrid McCawley, Paul Cassell, Brad Edwards Plaintiff has objected that Defendant's requests are overly broad and unduly burdensome, as individually logging all privileged responsive documents would be overly burdensome. Plaintiff contends that requests targeting such privileged information are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, are not important to resolving the issues, are not relevant to any party's claim or defense, are not proportional to the needs of the case, and creates a heavy burden on Plaintiff that outweighs its benefit. Therefore, Plaintiff has employed categorical logging pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.2(c). This categorical entry is regarding correspondence re the currently ongoing criminal investigation of Defendant and others. Public Interest Withheld approx. 57 documents DOJ-OGR-00004201