Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410 Filed 11/04/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
November 3, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
Attached please find the parties' joint request to charge and proposed verdict sheet. The Government is docketing a redacted version today and submitting the unredacted versions to the Court. The redline text in the documents reflect the objections of the defense. Further detail of the parties' objections are contained in comment bubbles.
The Government has proposed the only redactions in the Request to Charge. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's request to charge is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of a third party.
The Government is also providing under seal Exhibit A, which pertains to a defense comment. The defense informs the Government that this exhibit is a document from another case
DOJ-OGR-00006065
Full Text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410 Filed 11/04/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
November 3, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
Attached please find the parties' joint request to charge and proposed verdict sheet. The Government is docketing a redacted version today and submitting the unredacted versions to the Court. The redline text in the documents reflect the objections of the defense. Further detail of the parties' objections are contained in comment bubbles.
The Government has proposed the only redactions in the Request to Charge. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's request to charge is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of a third party.
The Government is also providing under seal Exhibit A, which pertains to a defense comment. The defense informs the Government that this exhibit is a document from another case
DOJ-OGR-00006065
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410 Filed 11/04/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2
that was not itself publicly docketed and therefore is submitting Exhibit A under seal.
Respectfully submitted,
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney
By: s/
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00006066
Individual Pages
Page 1 of 2 - DOJ-OGR-00006065
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00006066
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410 Filed 11/04/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2
that was not itself publicly docketed and therefore is submitting Exhibit A under seal.
Respectfully submitted,
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney
By: s/
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00006066