Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 481 Filed 11/21/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
November 21, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
Pursuant to the Court's Order at Dkt. No. 477, the Government is submitting today proposed redactions to the parties' supplemental briefing regarding Witness-3 and the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order resolving those motions.
The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the parties' supplemental briefing and the Court's Opinion & Order are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the limited proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of Witness-3, who has not identified herself on the record in this case, and who is a subject of the Court's pseudonym order. In addition, some of the proposed redactions reference sealed materials from the Rule 412 litigation, which are "related materials" within the meaning of Fed. R. Evid. 412(c)(2).
DOJ-OGR-00007383
Full Text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 481 Filed 11/21/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
November 21, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
Pursuant to the Court's Order at Dkt. No. 477, the Government is submitting today proposed redactions to the parties' supplemental briefing regarding Witness-3 and the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order resolving those motions.
The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the parties' supplemental briefing and the Court's Opinion & Order are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the limited proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of Witness-3, who has not identified herself on the record in this case, and who is a subject of the Court's pseudonym order. In addition, some of the proposed redactions reference sealed materials from the Rule 412 litigation, which are "related materials" within the meaning of Fed. R. Evid. 412(c)(2).
DOJ-OGR-00007383
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 481 Filed 11/21/21 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF) DOJ-OGR-00007384
Individual Pages
Page 1 - DOJ-OGR-00007383
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00007384
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 481 Filed 11/21/21 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF) DOJ-OGR-00007384