Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 519 Filed 11/30/21 Page 1 of 3
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364
FX 303.832.2628
www.hmflaw.com
jpagliuca@hmflaw.com
November 30, 2021
VIA ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan,
I write following our conferral with the government about protecting the anonymity of certain testifying witnesses in this case. The government suggested to us that we must avoid any public mention of: (1) names of people, places, or specific addresses or locations; (2) particular dates of career events or life events; (3) names of any employers, particular performances, or characters played; (4) specific details of story arcs in any performances played; (5) references to publicly available information or publicly available records that contain a pseudonymous witness's real name; and (6) court filings or other court documents.
Respectfully, the government's proposal is overly broad and unworkable.
We are mindful of the Court's orders on this topic, and we have no objection to many of the government's suggestions—e.g., the names of people or specific addresses or particular employers. But the government's proposal reaches much too far, and it would unfairly constrain Ms. Maxwell's ability to meaningfully and effectively confront her accusers. U.S. Const. amend. VI.
DOJ-OGR-00008202
Full Text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 519 Filed 11/30/21 Page 1 of 3
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364
FX 303.832.2628
www.hmflaw.com
jpagliuca@hmflaw.com
November 30, 2021
VIA ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan,
I write following our conferral with the government about protecting the anonymity of certain testifying witnesses in this case. The government suggested to us that we must avoid any public mention of: (1) names of people, places, or specific addresses or locations; (2) particular dates of career events or life events; (3) names of any employers, particular performances, or characters played; (4) specific details of story arcs in any performances played; (5) references to publicly available information or publicly available records that contain a pseudonymous witness's real name; and (6) court filings or other court documents.
Respectfully, the government's proposal is overly broad and unworkable.
We are mindful of the Court's orders on this topic, and we have no objection to many of the government's suggestions—e.g., the names of people or specific addresses or particular employers. But the government's proposal reaches much too far, and it would unfairly constrain Ms. Maxwell's ability to meaningfully and effectively confront her accusers. U.S. Const. amend. VI.
DOJ-OGR-00008202
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 519 Filed 11/30/21 Page 2 of 3
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
November 30, 2021
Page 2
Not only that, but the government's direct examination of Jane today would have violated its own proposal—for example, the government elicited testimony about where Jane attended school and during what years, a prime example of a "specific location" and "particular dates of life events" the government now seeks to prevent Ms. Maxwell from eliciting on cross-examination. The government's proposal is also contrary to this Court's earlier ruling permitting Ms. Maxwell to confront her accusers by eliciting evidence of their story lines.
We will remain cognizant of our duty to avoid revealing the names of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms. And we will alert the government and the court in advance as we are able to anticipate any issues.
DOJ-OGR-00008203
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 519 Filed 11/30/21 Page 3 of 3
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
November 30, 2021
Page 3
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Laura A. Menninger
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303-831-7364
Christian R. Everdell
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Phone: 212-957-7600
Bobbi C. Sternheim
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
Phone: 212-243-1100
Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell
cc: Counsel of record (via ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00008204
Individual Pages
Page 1 - DOJ-OGR-00008202
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00008203
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 519 Filed 11/30/21 Page 2 of 3
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
November 30, 2021
Page 2
Not only that, but the government's direct examination of Jane today would have violated its own proposal—for example, the government elicited testimony about where Jane attended school and during what years, a prime example of a "specific location" and "particular dates of life events" the government now seeks to prevent Ms. Maxwell from eliciting on cross-examination. The government's proposal is also contrary to this Court's earlier ruling permitting Ms. Maxwell to confront her accusers by eliciting evidence of their story lines.
We will remain cognizant of our duty to avoid revealing the names of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms. And we will alert the government and the court in advance as we are able to anticipate any issues.
DOJ-OGR-00008203
Page 3 - DOJ-OGR-00008204
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 519 Filed 11/30/21 Page 3 of 3
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
November 30, 2021
Page 3
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Laura A. Menninger
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303-831-7364
Christian R. Everdell
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Phone: 212-957-7600
Bobbi C. Sternheim
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
Phone: 212-243-1100
Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell
cc: Counsel of record (via ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00008204