Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 534 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
December 9, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully seeks redactions to its letter motion for admission of Government Exhibit 52 (Dkt. No. 533), sealing of Exhibit A to that letter, and redactions to Exhibit B to that letter. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's letter and exhibits are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the limited proposed redactions and sealing are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of the Minor Victims and witnesses, including individuals who are subjects of the Court's pseudonym order, as well as third parties. The Government also notes that the redactions to Exhibit B conform to redactions of that document in Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP).
DOJ-OGR-00008301
Full Text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 534 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
December 9, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully seeks redactions to its letter motion for admission of Government Exhibit 52 (Dkt. No. 533), sealing of Exhibit A to that letter, and redactions to Exhibit B to that letter. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's letter and exhibits are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the limited proposed redactions and sealing are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of the Minor Victims and witnesses, including individuals who are subjects of the Court's pseudonym order, as well as third parties. The Government also notes that the redactions to Exhibit B conform to redactions of that document in Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP).
DOJ-OGR-00008301
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 534 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney
By: s/
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00008302
Individual Pages
Page 1 of 2 - DOJ-OGR-00008301
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00008302
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 534 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney
By: s/
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00008302