Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 571 Filed 01/05/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the parties' letters. Dkt. Nos. 568, 569, 570. The Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule for the Defense to move for a new trial in light of the issues raised in the parties' letters:
- Defense motion: January 19, 2022
- Government response: February 2, 2022
- Defense reply: February 9, 2022
The parties' briefing should address whether an inquiry of some kind is permitted and/or required, and, if so, the nature of such an inquiry. Although the Court reserves decision on whether an inquiry of any kind is warranted, the Court grants the Government's request, Dkt. No. 568, to offer court-appointed counsel to the juror in issue. Subject to the juror's right to decline court-appointed counsel, the Court will appoint the on-duty CJA counsel to represent the juror. If counsel for the juror wishes to be heard on the issue of the appropriateness of an inquiry, briefing by the juror's counsel may be filed by January 26, 2022.
The Court will not adjourn post-trial briefing on other issues as requested by the Defense, Dkt. No. 569, but sets the following schedule for any other post-verdict motion by the Defense:
1
DOJ-OGR-00008807
Full Text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 571 Filed 01/05/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the parties' letters. Dkt. Nos. 568, 569, 570. The Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule for the Defense to move for a new trial in light of the issues raised in the parties' letters:
- Defense motion: January 19, 2022
- Government response: February 2, 2022
- Defense reply: February 9, 2022
The parties' briefing should address whether an inquiry of some kind is permitted and/or required, and, if so, the nature of such an inquiry. Although the Court reserves decision on whether an inquiry of any kind is warranted, the Court grants the Government's request, Dkt. No. 568, to offer court-appointed counsel to the juror in issue. Subject to the juror's right to decline court-appointed counsel, the Court will appoint the on-duty CJA counsel to represent the juror. If counsel for the juror wishes to be heard on the issue of the appropriateness of an inquiry, briefing by the juror's counsel may be filed by January 26, 2022.
The Court will not adjourn post-trial briefing on other issues as requested by the Defense, Dkt. No. 569, but sets the following schedule for any other post-verdict motion by the Defense:
1
DOJ-OGR-00008807
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 571 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2 of 2
- Defense motion: February 4, 2022
- Government opposition: February 18, 2022
- Defense reply: March 4, 2022
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2022 New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00008808
Individual Pages
Page 1 - DOJ-OGR-00008807
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00008808
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 571 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2 of 2
- Defense motion: February 4, 2022
- Government opposition: February 18, 2022
- Defense reply: March 4, 2022
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2022 New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00008808