Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 733 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 2
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364
FX 303.832.2628
www.hmflaw.com
jpagliuca@hmflaw.com
November 28, 2021
VIA EMAIL
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan,
On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we respectfully submit this letter in response to the government's letter, dated November 27, 2021, seeking to preclude certain topics of cross-examination.1 The defense does not intend to cross-examine Accuser-1 or Accuser-2 about [REDACTED] unless their testimony opens the door to such cross-examination. Similarly, the defense does not intend to cross-examine Accuser-1 about [REDACTED] unless the witness's testimony opens the door to such cross-examination.
However, Accuser-1's brother, who is a testifying witness, told the government less than three weeks ago that [REDACTED].
1 Pursuant to our established protocol, the defense is submitting this letter to the Court under temporary seal to allow the government to propose any appropriate redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00011449
Full Text
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 733 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 2
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364
FX 303.832.2628
www.hmflaw.com
jpagliuca@hmflaw.com
November 28, 2021
VIA EMAIL
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan,
On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we respectfully submit this letter in response to the government's letter, dated November 27, 2021, seeking to preclude certain topics of cross-examination.1 The defense does not intend to cross-examine Accuser-1 or Accuser-2 about [REDACTED] unless their testimony opens the door to such cross-examination. Similarly, the defense does not intend to cross-examine Accuser-1 about [REDACTED] unless the witness's testimony opens the door to such cross-examination.
However, Accuser-1's brother, who is a testifying witness, told the government less than three weeks ago that [REDACTED].
1 Pursuant to our established protocol, the defense is submitting this letter to the Court under temporary seal to allow the government to propose any appropriate redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00011449
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 733 Filed 07/14/22 Page 2 of 2
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
November 28, 2021
Page 2
should be permitted to cross-examine Accuser-1 about because it is relevant to her ability to recall the events in question accurately. As the government concedes, it is
The defense
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
CC: Counsel of Record
DOJ-OGR-00011450
Individual Pages
Page 1 - DOJ-OGR-00011449
Page 2 - DOJ-OGR-00011450
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 733 Filed 07/14/22 Page 2 of 2
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
November 28, 2021
Page 2
should be permitted to cross-examine Accuser-1 about because it is relevant to her ability to recall the events in question accurately. As the government concedes, it is
The defense
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
CC: Counsel of Record
DOJ-OGR-00011450