Full Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
Page 101
C2frdau3
1 witness, we would have otherwise called Ms. Conrad in order to
2 elicit these facts, so somebody looking back on this record
3 later on has no misimpression of a defendant calling a witness
4 who the government selectively decides to immunize. We were
5 going to call this witness ourselves. We made a decision that
6 her testimony is in the public interest; that's why we are
7 seeking the immunity. I just wanted to make that clear to your
8 Honor.
9 THE COURT: Fine. Ms. Sternheim, if you would like,
10 you may take a seat in the jury box during her examination.
11 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.
12 THE COURT: Let's bring out Ms. Conrad.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, may I take the seat
14 closest?
15 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, come on down.
16 CATHERINE M. CONRAD,
17 called as a witness by the defendant,
18 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
19 THE COURT: Would you take a seat and state your full
20 name and spell your name slowly for the court reporter.
21 THE WITNESS: Catherine with a C,C-A-T-H-E-R-I-N-E,
22 Conrad, C-O-N-R-A-D.
23 THE COURT: Mr. Gair, you may inquire.
24 DIRECT EXAMINATION
25 BY MR. GAIR:
...
(Continued on next page)
Page 101 - Page 104 (26)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS