← Back to home

Document A-5643

AI Analysis

Summary: The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness named Conrad is being questioned about their understanding of a judge's inquiry regarding their finances and the appointment of a lawyer. The witness confirms understanding the connection between the two topics. The transcript is part of a larger legal case involving Paul M. Daugerdas in the United States of America.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the witness's understanding of a judicial inquiry and their connection to a legal proceeding involving Paul M. Daugerdas.
Key Topics: connection between financial discussion and lawyer appointment witness understanding of judicial inquiry
Key People:
  • Conrad - witness being deposed
  • Judge Pauley - judge asking questions during a proceeding
Document Type
Transcript
Date
February 15, 2012
Pages
1
Folder
IMAGES004

Full Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., February 15, 2012 Page 133 C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct 1 Q. So my question is, did you understand at that moment that 2 there was a logical connection between the question Judge 3 Pauley was asking you about your finances and the matter he was 4 discussing with you, that is, appointment of a lawyer? 5 A. Yes, sir. ... Page 136 C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct ... 25 A. I don't know what your question means. Page 133 - Page 136 (34) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS DOJ-OGR-00009926