← Back to home

Document A-5667

AI Analysis

Summary: The document is a transcript of a juror's testimony, where they are questioned about not disclosing their criminal history during voir dire. The juror is confronted with potential motives for lying, including curiosity about the case. The testimony suggests that the juror may have been dishonest about their background.
Significance: This document potentially reveals that a juror may have lied about their criminal history during voir dire, which could be grounds for a mistrial or appeal.
Key Topics: voir dire juror dishonesty criminal history disclosure
Key People:
  • Conrad - juror being questioned
Document Type
Transcript
Date
February 15, 2012
Pages
1
Folder
IMAGES004

Full Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., February 15, 2012 Page 229 - Page 232 (58) C2frdau7 Conrad - redirect Page 229 1 concerned at the voir dire that you didn't reveal your criminal history because the defendants would want criminals on the jury? ... C2frdau7 Conrad - cross Page 232 1 Q. And you thought it was worth lying about your background to be on a case because it piqued your curiosity? ... SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS DOJ-OGR-00009950