← Back to home

Document A-5738

Full Text

C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 281 1 the same problem of trying to remember what was said versus 2 what was thought, but I think what was discussed is, look, it's 3 not her. She's sworn before Judge Pauley, the note doesn't 4 change the picture and, you know, this is kind of crazy. You 5 can't start sending a private investigator out on a juror. She 6 said she's someone else, she seems like a housewife from 7 Bronxville. It would be unfathomable or inconceivable or 8 something for a person who was in fact a lawyer to have sworn 9 under oath that she was someone else. It was something where 10 we discussed it and concluded that it made no sense, and Juror 11 No. 1 was who she said she was. 12 Q. So just so I'm clear, Ms. Brune, Ms. Trzaskoma did tell you 13 in that conversation that she thought Juror No. 1 could be 14 Catherine Conrad the suspended attorney? 15 A. What she said is that note makes me wonder if it could be 16 the same person. 17 Q. And are you telling me that Ms. Trzaskoma made no mention 18 whatsoever of the Westlaw report that she had found? 19 A. I'm confident that's so, and here's why. Laurie Edelstein 20 is the kind of person who will always kind of say, well, show 21 me the case, she show me the document. She's extremely thorough, 22 and if she had referenced the document in the conversation 23 that's what Ms. Edelstein would have said. So I know that 24 there was no reference to it in the conversation. 25 Q. So even as you're standing there, Ms. Brune, the thought SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010021