← Back to home

Document A-5753

AI Analysis

Summary: The deposition of Ms. Brune discusses her knowledge of emails and a conference call with the Court on July 15th, as well as her subsequent actions and understanding of Ms. Trzaskoma's statements during the call. Ms. Brune clarifies the timing of when she saw certain emails and a transcript of the conference call relative to filing a July 21st letter. The testimony touches on whether Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court were accurate based on her knowledge at the time.
Significance: This deposition transcript is potentially important because it reveals discrepancies or potential misrepresentations made during a court conference call and the actions taken by individuals involved afterward.
Key Topics: July 15th conference call with the Court Emails and their timing relative to the conference call and a July 21st letter Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court during the conference call
Key People:
  • Ms. Brune - witness being deposed
  • Ms. Trzaskoma - person who informed Ms. Brune about the conference call and whose statements to the Court are being questioned
  • Judge Pauley - presiding judge who directed actions during the July 15th conference call
Document Type
Transcript
Date
Unknown
Pages
1
Folder
IMAGES004

Full Text

C2grdau2 Brune - direct 296 1 the Court. 2 Q. Do you think it was before the July 15th conference call 3 with the Court? 4 A. I did not see it before the July 15th conference call with 5 the Court. 6 Q. Do you think it was before you filed your July 21st letter? 7 A. Yes, it was. 8 Q. You were not on the July 15th conference call, correct? 9 A. That's correct. 10 Q. You saw a transcript of the conference call? 11 A. Ms. Trzaskoma let me know about it immediately after that, 12 and I also read the transcript when it became available. 13 Q. Approximately when was that? Was that before you filed 14 your July 21st letter? 15 A. Oh, yes, within a day. 16 Q. You're accustomed to get daily or -- in other words, this 17 was not an instance where you ordered like a 30-day-out 18 transcript? 19 A. Oh, no. We had to respond, so I read the transcript to 20 make sure that I knew what Judge Pauley was directing us to do. 21 Q. At the point at which you saw those emails, Ms. Brune, at 22 the very least you knew that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the 23 Court in that conference call were not correct? 24 A. I disagree. 25 Q. Did she reveal to the Court what she knew? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300