← Back to home

Document A-5770

AI Analysis

Summary: The deposition transcript shows a witness being questioned about a Westlaw report for Catherine M. Conrad, verifying her identity and age. The witness confirms that the name on the report matches the one provided on the jury list before voir dire.
Significance: This document appears to be a crucial piece of evidence in verifying the identity of a juror and potentially challenging the jury selection process.
Key Topics: Review of a Westlaw report Identity verification of Catherine M. Conrad Jury list and voir dire process
Key People:
  • Catherine M. Conrad - The individual whose identity is being verified
  • MR. GAIR - Attorney who raised an objection
  • MR. SHECHTMAN - Attorney who raised an objection
  • THE COURT - The judge presiding over the deposition

Full Text

C2grdau2 Brune - redirect 313 1 A. OK. 2 Q. You have had a chance, I take it, to review this Westlaw 3 report prior to this very moment, correct? 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. I'd like to take you through it very briefly. 6 MR. GAIR: Objection, your Honor. Way beyond the 7 scope. 8 THE COURT: Overruled. 9 Q. The top of it says Catherine M. Conrad, 10 A. Yes, it does. 11 Q. That is the identical name that was provided to your firm 12 with the jury list at the very beginning before voir dire ever 13 started, correct? 14 A. That's right. 15 Q. It has the year of birth of 1969, correct? 16 A. I'm sure you're right. 17 Q. I'm going front page. 18 A. OK. 19 Q. Do you see that? 20 A. It says that the person's age is 41. 21 Q. It also has a year of birth 1969? 22 MR. SHECHTMAN: Objection. 23 THE COURT: It's redacted in the exhibit. 24 Q. Very well. It has her age? 25 A. It does. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010053