Full Text
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 325
1 attorney?
2 A. I don't believe she had formed a belief about the New York
3 attorney. She mentioned that there was an attorney, a
4 suspended attorney with the same name, and that after having
5 received the note from Juror No. 1 that mentioned several legal
6 concepts, she had thought that could it possibly be they were
7 the same person.
8 Q. And at what point did you ask Ms. Trzaskoma for the
9 evidence, the underlying documents or information that led her
10 to believe that there was a possible connection between Juror
11 No. 1 and the suspended New York attorney?
12 A. I didn't realize that there was a document that she was
13 basing any belief on. It was the fact that there was a
14 suspended lawyer with the same name.
15 Q. Well, didn't you ask how did you form this belief or what
16 did you look at to see that there was a suspended New York
17 attorney? Did you ask that question?
18 MR. GAIR: Objection. Three questions. Compound.
19 THE COURT: Overruled.
20 A. No, I did not.
21 Q. So do you mean to tell us that you at no point asked
22 Theresa Trzaskoma for what underlying information she saw that
23 led her to believe that there was a possible connection between
24 Juror No. 1 and the suspended New York attorney? Yes or no.
25 A. I'm not sure that was a yes or no question, but she
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010065