Full Text
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 328
1 which was the information that we had and Ms. Conrad had
2 unambiguously stated that she had a BA in English literature,
3 that that was her highest level of education, that she was a
4 stay-at-home wife, and I assumed that Ms. Conrad was telling
5 the truth when she responded on voir dire.
6 It just was inconceivable to me that she was the same
7 person. I wasn't thinking about middle initials. I know that
8 in hindsight we now know that they're the same person and that
9 they have the same middle initial, but at the time I had no
10 idea that Juror No. 1's middle initial was M.
11 Q. Theresa Trzaskoma didn't tell you that the report that she
12 had seen on either e-mail or otherwise had the middle initial
13 with M. for Catherine M. Conrad, the suspended New York
14 attorney?
15 A. Ms. Trzaskoma did not mention any report.
16 Q. Did Ms. Trzaskoma mention to you the Westlaw printout that
17 she had seen that had various biographical information for
18 someone named Catherine M. Conrad?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Did you ask Ms. Trzaskoma for any of the underlying
21 documents that led to her belief that Juror No. 1 may be the
22 same Catherine M. Conrad who was a suspended New York attorney?
23 Yes or no, did you ask for any documents?
24 A. I did not ask for any documents, no.
25 Q. How long did this conversation between you and Ms.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010068