Document A-5786

Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page 101 of 130 A-5786 Edelstein 329 C2GFDAU3 1 Trzaskoma take? 2 A. Five minutes. 3 Q. And I think you said earlier, let me take you through this 4 again, that Ms. Trzaskoma articulated something to the effect 5 of, correct me if I'm wrong, that she just wanted to let you 6 know that she saw the suspension report. Is that fair? 7 A. No. I think what she said was we wanted to let us know 8 that after thinking about the note that we had received from 9 Juror No. 1 she had recalled that there was a suspended lawyer 10 with the same name and that she had wondered whether it was 11 possible that they were the same person. 12 Q. Did she say anything else to you? 13 A. Well, we then discussed Juror No. 1's responses on voir dire and after that discussion my response was there's no way 14 they're the same person. 15 16 Q. So how would you describe the level of knowledge that Ms. 17 Trzaskoma had when she came to you with respect to her degree 18 of certainty that Juror No. 1 was the Catherine M. Conrad in 19 the suspension report? 20 A. I think that she had thought that there was a possibility 21 that they were the same person, but she had reviewed the voir 22 dire responses and they were entirely inconsistent with her 23 being a lawyer. 24 Q. Well, did she tell you, did Ms. Trzaskoma tell you that 25 earlier that day she had reviewed the voir dire responses but SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00009390 --- PAGE BREAK --- C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 329 1 Trzaskoma take? 2 A. Five minutes. 3 Q. And I think you said earlier, let me take you through this 4 again, that Ms. Trzaskoma articulated something to the effect 5 of, correct me if I'm wrong, that she just wanted to let you 6 know that she saw the suspension report. Is that fair? 7 A. No. I think what she said was we wanted to let us know 8 that after thinking about the note that we had received from 9 Juror No. 1 she had recalled that there was a suspended lawyer 10 with the same name and that she had wondered whether it was 11 possible that they were the same person. 12 Q. Did she say anything else to you? 13 A. Well, we then discussed Juror No. 1's responses on voir 14 dire and after that discussion my response was there's no way 15 they're the same person. 16 Q. So how would you describe the level of knowledge that Ms. 17 Trzaskoma had when she came to you with respect to her degree 18 of certainty that Juror No. 1 was the Catherine M. Conrad in 19 the suspension report? 20 A. I think that she had thought that there was a possibility 21 that they were the same person, but she had reviewed the voir 22 dire responses and they were entirely inconsistent with her 23 being a lawyer. 24 Q. Well, did she tell you, did Ms. Trzaskoma tell you that 25 earlier that day she had reviewed the voir dire responses but SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010069