← Back to home

Document A-5819

AI Analysis

Summary: Schoeman testifies about a conversation with Trzaskoma that occurred during jury deliberations, after a juror's note was received. He clarifies the timing and details of the conversation and follow-up questions he asked.
Significance: This deposition testimony is potentially important because it reveals details about a conversation between Schoeman and Trzaskoma that occurred during a trial, possibly related to jury deliberations.
Key Topics: Conversation between Schoeman and Trzaskoma Timing of the conversation relative to a juror's note Follow-up questions asked by Schoeman
Key People:
  • Schoeman - Witness being deposed
  • Trzaskoma - Person Schoeman had a conversation with
  • DeRosa - Person whose regards were exchanged
  • Mr. Shechtman - Attorney conducting direct examination
  • Mr. Okula - Attorney conducting cross-examination

Full Text

C2grdau4 Schoeman - direct 362 1 Q. Did you take any action based on that conversation? 2 A. No. 3 Q. We know that it was after the juror's note. Do you recall 4 when it was? 5 A. I can't say exactly when it was. I believe it was during 6 the deliberations either that Friday or sometime the following 7 week. 8 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions. 9 THE COURT: Cross-examination? 10 MR. OKULA: Briefly, your Honor. 11 CROSS-EXAMINATION 12 BY MR. OKULA: 13 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Schoeman. How are you? 14 A. Good, thank you. Good afternoon. 15 Q. Dr. DeRosa sends his regards? 16 A. I send mine right back. 17 Q. You said you had this conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma after 18 the note was received in court, is that correct? 19 A. Yes. 20 Q. Was it the same day or the following day? 21 A. I don't believe it was either the same day or the following 22 day. I believe it was sometime a couple of days or several 23 days later. 24 Q. You talked about the follow-up questions that you asked to 25 try to get to the bottom of the information, is that correct? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010102