← Back to home

Document A-5837

AI Analysis

Summary: The court transcript shows a discussion between the judge and counsel (MR. SHECHTMAN and MR. OKULA) regarding scheduling initial briefs, with dates set for March 23rd and April 5th. The judge adjourns the hearing, thanking counsel for their professionalism. The transcript ends with the court being adjourned.
Significance: This document captures a court proceeding where scheduling decisions were made and reflects the professional conduct of the counsel involved.
Key Topics: scheduling of initial briefs court proceedings case management
Key People:
  • MR. SHECHTMAN - counsel
  • MR. OKULA - counsel
  • THE COURT - presiding judge
Document Type
Transcript
Date
Unknown
Pages
1
Folder
IMAGES004

Full Text

C2grdau4 MR. SHECHTMAN: I'd be happy if we could have March 19th so we can't get that extra weekend. THE COURT: I'll give you until the 23rd if you want. MR. OKULA: That's fine. It separates it from St. Patrick's Day more, Judge. THE COURT: All right. March 23 for the initial briefs. Why don't you provide your responses by April 5th. MR. OKULA: That's fine, Judge. THE COURT: Will that work? MR. SHECHTMAN: Yes. THE COURT: I'll take the matter then on submission. Is there anything else that counsel want to raise? MR. OKULA: Not other than our thanks, Judge. THE COURT: My thanks to all of you for conducting the hearing in the customary professional and efficient manner. Certainly there are some aspects of it that have been memorable, and that's an understatement. Have a good afternoon. (Adjourned) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300