← Back to home

Document DOJ-OGR-00006309

AI Analysis

Summary: The court grants a continuance in the case United States v. SILVERMAN, excluding time under the Speedy Trial Act from March 8, 2019 to April 11, 2019, to allow counsel for both sides sufficient preparation time. The order is based on the stipulation between the Government and MDC. The court finds that a continuance is necessary to serve the ends of justice.
Significance: This document is a court order granting a continuance and excluding time under the Speedy Trial Act, indicating a significant development in the case against David Silverman.
Key Topics: United States v. SILVERMAN Speedy Trial Act Continuance and exclusion of time
Key People:
  • David Silverman - Defendant
  • Andrew Rothstein - Assistant United States Attorney
  • Lara Pomerantz - Assistant United States Attorney
  • Alison Moe - Assistant United States Attorney
  • Matthew J. Cashion - Assistant United States Attorney

Full Text

C: Defense Counsel (B3EF) Assistant United States Attorney Andrew Rothstein Lara Pomerantz Alison Moe Matthew J. Cashion HE: /s United States v. SILVERMAN DAVID MILITIAMEN Experienced and Respected, 'Resilient and Resourceful' 1,400 at the bar of MDC. MDC s, as MDC and the Government have stipulated. I therefore conclude that the Government has met its burden and that the ends of justice would be served by a continuance and an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and that the period of time from March 8, 2019 (when the last status hearing was held) up to and including April 11, 2019 is hereby excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that the failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant and counsel for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/6/18 Page 2