← Back to home

Document DOJ-OGR-00024949

AI Analysis

Summary: The document discusses the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration, noting that a recommendation to house him with another sex offender was not acted upon. It also highlights inaccuracies in the documentation related to his incident report and Psychology Services Intake Screening, including typographical errors and incorrect information about his criminal history and demographics.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it highlights potential negligence or inaccuracies in the handling and documentation of Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration, particularly regarding his housing and the recording of his criminal history.
Key Topics: Jeffrey Epstein's housing and management in prison Accuracy of documentation related to Epstein's incident report Psychology Services Intake Screening errors
Key People:
  • Jeffrey Epstein - Inmate being discussed regarding housing and documentation

Full Text

Page 490 reviewed the consult and recommendation from the Psychology Services Branch, Central Office that Mr. Epstein be housed with another inmate who had also been accused of committing a sex offense. There is no evidence this information was considered beyond this e-mail, and Mr. Epstein was never housed with another inmate charged or convicted of a sexual offense. (b)(5) 4. Documentation Accuracy: (b)(7)(A) (b)(7)(A) It is critical that all descriptions of the incident accurately reflect objective evidence. (b)(7)(A) (b)(7)(A) Although the incident report was later expunged, inmates frequently experience significant stress when they contemplate the potential consequences associated with findings of guilt. (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) entered a Psychology Services Intake Screening into PDS-BEMR on July 8, 2010. The document has three typographical errors. She selected the No Sexual Offense Convictions check box when, in fact, Mr. Epstein was previously convicted of Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under the Age of 18 for Prostitution. Second, Mr. Epstein was erroneously identified as a Black male in this document. Finally, there is one instance where he was mistakenly referred to as (b)(6); (b)(7(C) 8 DOJ-OGR-00024949